A Bayesian Analysis Proves That SARS-CoV-2 Is Laboratory Derived 

zaidpub (old blog)
zaidpub (old blog)

“The starting probability for origin of SARS-CoV-2 was set with the zoonotic or natural hypothesis at 98.8% likelihood with the laboratory origin hypothesis set at 1.2%. ” However, through a comprehensive and detailed Bayesian analysis of 26 publicly released evidence (including “furin cleavage site “, etc.), the conclusion is that the probability of the SARS-CoV-2 originating in the laboratory is as high as 99.8%, i.e. “beyond a reasonable doubt that SARS-CoV-2 is not a natural zoonosis but instead is laboratory derived”.
THE SCIENCE PROVES THAT AUTHORITIES HAVE BEEN LYING TO US
A Bayesian Analysis Proves That SARS-CoV-2 Is Laboratory Derived | From the Trenches World Report